The new German-made Rheinmetall Panther KF 51 tank runs on the same amount of on-board power as its predecessor, the Leopard 2, according to several reports on its release. This raises interesting questions about the ability of the new tank to meet a growing need for onboard power. Having the same power as the Leopard 2 is incompatible with the new electronics and digital computing that would be incorporated into the Panther, as the integration of a new generation of exportable power was one of the tank’s most critical innovations. U.S. Army Abrams. Years ago, the developers built an auxiliary power unit to allow more power on board and support its new electronics, computing, and command and control technology. New applications for on-board power generators take things a step further by finding ways to reduce the hardware footprint and streamline large amounts of power to the subsystems needed for targeting, computing, and networking.
There’s another area that lends itself to a measure of ambiguity, as it’s by no means clear that the new Panther would outperform the new Abrams variants with its sensors. A Popular mechanics The editorial mentions that the Panther is designed with 360-degree “surround sensors”, which allows tank crews to see obstacles and potential adversaries from any angle.
Again, details regarding Abrams’ security and targeting innovations are often unavailable for security reasons, however, 360 degree sensing technology does exist in the US Army and US Air Force. strength for many years. As early as 2008, some of the US Army’s manned ground vehicles for its future combat systems programs were built with it, and platforms such as the F-35 stealth fighter also have it. If there is 360 degree detection and vastly improved and revolutionary thermal targeting technology with the Abrams, why would there be such a big difference between the Panther and the Abrams?
The M1A2 SEP v3 brings a new high-resolution display for the gunner and commander stations and new line-replaceable electronic units. It also includes a driver’s control panel and a turret control unit. The new variant incorporates improved munitions datalinks and electronic warfare weapons, such as the Counter Electronic Warfare Remote Controlled Improvised Explosive Device (CREW). Ethernet cables are also included to better network the vehicle’s sensors.
One of v3’s signature elements is its longer range, higher resolution thermal targeting sights. This is a crucial area of innovation for the US military, as many will likely remember the stories of the famous tank battles of the Gulf War. Abrams tanks were able to destroy Iraqi T-72s from a distance, which greatly contributed to American victories on the battlefield. It’s the kind of technological capability that can be continually updated to ensure common standards.
As part of this kind of equation, the latest variants of the US Army’s Abrams are designed with a common Internet protocol and standards to allow new technologies to integrate quickly. Part of the benefit of having faster processing speeds and AI-based computing is that an Abrams can operate with a much smaller hardware footprint, while completing more tasks faster. embarked.
Kris Osborn is the Defense Editor for the National Interest. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a highly trained expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army – Acquisition, Logistics and Technology. Osborn also worked as an on-air military anchor and specialist on national television networks. He has appeared as a guest military pundit on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also holds an MA in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.