491st

Main Menu

  • Home
  • American army
  • American military
  • American government
  • American company

491st

Header Banner

491st

  • Home
  • American army
  • American military
  • American government
  • American company
American government
Home›American government›Marco Rubio: No US government agency is above the law, certainly not the CIA

Marco Rubio: No US government agency is above the law, certainly not the CIA

By Brandi J. Williams
April 8, 2022
0
0

This week, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, R-Fla., vice chairman of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, delivered opening remarks at the committee’s public hearing on the nomination of Kate Heinzelman be General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Rubio said the following:

“Thank you, President Warner, and thank you, Mrs. Heinzelman, for being here, and welcome to your family. And thank you for giving me the opportunity yesterday to meet with you and discuss your appointment.

“As I told you, the CIA’s General Counsel plays an important role, given the work the agency does on behalf of our country. The CIA cannot carry out its global mission under the powers that it are conferred without an attorney providing policy and legal advice to the Director.

“No US government agency is above the law, certainly not the CIA, and it is important that their activities always comply with the law. This committee was created to provide oversight of the CIA and the entire intelligence community. That said, it is important that counsel, at the same time, do not impede agency operations when working under presidential authority and with congressional support through authorizations and funding. The role of lawyers is to ensure that they follow the law, but also not to become an unnecessary obstacle to the very difficult work of acting on behalf of the national interest of our country.

“I want to make a broader editorial point, which, while related to this nomination, is not a direct statement about you. I am interested in knowing more about you and your background and so on. It’s really a broader editorial point in an ongoing pattern that we’ve seen with some of this administration’s candidates, particularly in the intelligence community….

“Since [President Biden] took office, we have now processed a number of applicants, not only for the intelligence community but for other agencies, who at one time worked on behalf of either the the Chinese Communist Party [or] Chinese entities directly related to the Chinese state. I get that people don’t like it being characterized as such, but it is what it is. And anyone who understands the nature of the threat posed by China understands that is what it is.

“Here’s how the pattern generally went. They are highly qualified people, there is no doubt about that. They begin their work in a position of national security trust within the executive branch.

“They come out even more qualified and go to work for an international business law firm.

“In this company, although he has held positions in government that he or she should have had [learned] the true nature of the Chinese threat and all the ways they seek to influence American policy, they end up representing or working on behalf of certain state-controlled entities in China, usually representing them on issues such as helping understand US law.

“Fourth, this increasingly credentialed individual, who has now worked in the executive, has worked outside of government, is seeking to return to public service at the highest levels, where trust and judgment are paramount. And then that person is nominated for a position.

“So this pattern, the reason I’m pointing it out is that I think two things are at play here. The first is how difficult it has become to find highly qualified and credentialed individuals to serve who have not at some point in the private sector interacted with entities linked to the Chinese Communist Party, because that is exactly the nature of the challenge we face from China. . As a larger editorial, I really hope this administration will be more sensitive to this in the months ahead and in future appointments ahead of us.

“This is really a commentary on our internationally based American law firms and how their business model, in many ways, now enables and supports the soft power and subversive efforts of controlled entities. by the CCP.

“It doesn’t make those people who have been appointed in the past bad people. It doesn’t even disqualify them from important or rewarding work on behalf of the [U.S.] government. But I think it begins to demonstrate for us two things. Again, as I have already pointed out, [it demonstrates] how difficult it is to find people able to serve who have not, at some point, come up against the influence efforts of the Chinese government. And I think that also potentially reflects how some [in the Biden Administration] diminish how ubiquitous this has become and what a difficult challenge this Chinese threat has become for us.

“Having said that, I look forward to hearing more about you, your background, your qualifications, your perspective and your role, should you be confirmed. The position of General Counsel is very important as we have discussed. Yes, it’s about making sure they follow the law, but it’s also about providing advice and guidance on the options that exist to serve the national interest of our country, within the framework what the agency is authorized to do. I think that’s just as important in this role.

“So thank you for your willingness to serve, and we look forward to hearing your testimony.”
–

Florida Daily
Florida Daily
Latest articles by Florida Daily (see everything)

Categories

  • American army
  • American company
  • American government
  • American military

Recent Posts

  • Trial opens for Army reservist accused of storming the Capitol
  • Hailing from Tyler, US Army veteran injured in combat in Ukraine
  • An army veteran served as a tank commander in the Vietnam War
  • Why Combat Dive School is the toughest US Army Special Forces course
  • US military plans to let LGBTQ+ troops out of hostile states

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • January 2018
  • May 2017
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • March 2015
  • October 2014
  • June 2014
  • October 2012
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions